Space and Time 2.0

Chapter 10: The End Is Near

But... that only refers to the first development of the MZI prototype.

What possibilities can the new definition of time, space, energy, and matter open up for us?

Embedding a chaotic universe, in which every element is in interaction and effect with everything in different intensities, into a geometric concept as a computational matrix gives the chaos the order that has been sought for so long. A cosmos calculable down to the smallest detail – at least theoretically.

A system with which processes from the quantum world up to galactic scales and perhaps beyond can be uniformly understood and explained without the collapse of physical laws, without the need for singularities and exotic matter. A bit more of our perceived reality becomes calculable.

Black holes remain what they are: matter, compressed in an unbelievable way and brought beyond a tipping point into a structure consisting of tetrahedrons and octahedrons like the time grid.

Time remains individual and in the perception of time dependent on the observer's location, but it itself is no longer stretched or compressed. It is the measuring tool that makes transformation visible and comprehensible.

Space is not the stage on which everything happens. Space is the consequence of action and interaction. Space is dynamic and has properties similar to a surrounding membrane of variable thickness and extent with osmotic effect on the available potential of interaction.

Energy remains what it was, but it expands to include the frequencies and resonances observable in everything. It does not disappear but decreases and changes with increasing distance. Similar to waves caused by a falling stone when plunging into water.

What can the time grid – and also the interaction grid, which we can physically replicate through frequencies and frequency superpositions in the most diverse wavelengths and which is also found in some crystals – do for development?

Application: Quantum Computers

From the scale of the proton to the qubit: The grid scales seamlessly. For example, the computational matrix can be used for quantum computers.

Initial calculations have shown: The reduction of circuit depth through the MZI grid is not merely a detail advantage for certain algorithms. Rather, it opens a systematic way to keep quantum computers manageable even with growing qubit numbers. In this context, it is not a definition of quantum dynamics or the grid structures used in the MZI model so far, but this benchmark specifically concerns the efficiency and scalability of quantum computers, arising from fundamental considerations within the MZI model.

Through resonance-based couplings in the grid, which enable transformations in parallel blocks, a reduction factor of up to \( \sqrt{n} \) for \( n \) qubits arises. For \( n = 100 \), this would mean a reduction of the layer depth from around 4950 couplings to about 70 effective layers. While current hardware relies on linear or grid-like connections, the MZI grid offers a structured, resonance-based alternative that appears significantly more efficient both from theoretical reasons and practical benchmarks. If this approach is confirmed in experiments – for example, through simulations in IBM Qiskit or real hardware tests with 50+ qubits – the MZI grid could become a key concept in the development of scalable quantum computers. An additional advantage is that the lower layer depth allows more calculations within the coherence time of qubits.

Qubit number	randomized all-to-all	MZI √n reduction	MZI log reduction
10	100	31.6	46.1
50	2,500	70.7	100.4
100	10,000	100	126.2

Fig. 1: Comparison of gate depth between chaotic all-to-all model and MZI reduction approaches.

Dashed curve = All-to-all (chaotic couplings).
Solid curves = MZI model with different reduction factors.
With growing qubit number, the gate depth in the chaotic model rises quadratically, while the MZI model strongly dampens the complexity.

In conclusion, I hope that this model can accelerate and improve development. Especially because the MZI grid opens up so much potential, moral and ethical aspects must be considered with care so that it benefits the common good — developing not merely because it is possible, but so that it serves a higher purpose.

If none of this comes to pass, which I personally now consider unlikely, this little reading of ten chapters may at least have stimulated your imagination and been fun. Or enabled paths for entirely different ideas and concepts that actually have nothing to do with this model. Because ultimately, the MZI also arose from questions and randomly occurring possibilities of transformation in its limited availability of potentials.

Space and Time 2.0

Chapter 9: Time Grid and Black Holes in the MZI Model

9.1 The Theoretical Time Grid

So far, we have considered time as a grid structure. To make it more tangible, the time grid is defined more clearly. It consists of tetrahedrons and octahedrons evenly distributed without gaps. For the tetrahedrons and octahedrons, we assume an edge length of 3 radii of a proton. The basis for the definition is the smallest detectable or observable distance so far. The vertices are thus 3R = 3 · 0.84 fm = 2.52 fm. The time grid is a non-interacting computational matrix with theoretical potential transformation nodes (RpTN) at the vertices, defining or measuring possible changes (e.g., spacetime transformations):

\( (x, y, z, t) = (n \cdot a_0, m \cdot a_0, p \cdot a_0, k \cdot a_0/c) + \text{Offset}, \, a_0 = 2.52 \, \text{fm}. \)

It symbolizes an optimal equilibrium, possibly dimensionless, and serves as a reference structure for the MZI model, a "congruent transformation grid" for observing changes.

9.2 Black Holes as Maximum Compression of Matter

This grid structure could also correspond to the densest and most stable crystalline form into which mass can be transformed. We initially assume this state for matter in black holes. No singularity, but matter that is maximally compressed. Thus, a black hole can continuously bind more matter and grow, but only at the periphery of its spherical overall structure of tetra- and octahedrons. There is an upper limit to how much matter can be maximally added continuously. The black hole grid is a physical approximation of the time grid with protons at the grid corners (Np ≈ 6 × 10^{38}) and neutrons in octahedral interstices (Nn ≈ Np), edge length a0 = 2.52 fm. The total mass is:

\( M \approx 2 \times 10^{12} \, \text{kg}, \, r_s \approx 2.96 \, \text{fm}, \, \rho_{g+n} \approx 1.5 \times 10^{17} \, \text{kg/m}^3. \)

Alternatively, a0 = 10 fm is possible (\( \rho_{g+n} \approx 2.4 \times 10^{15} \, \text{kg/m}^3 \)), which facilitates stability but is less dense. Stability is ensured by gravity and the electron atmosphere:

\( \rho_e(r) = \rho_{e0} \cdot Ne/Ne_0 \cdot e^{-r/r_s}, \, Ne \approx Np. \)

The Coulomb repulsion: \( F_{\text{Coulomb}} \approx 3.6 \times 10^{7} \, \text{N} \) (at a0 = 2.52 fm), is balanced by the electron atmosphere. Neutrons (radius ~0.85 fm) reduce electromagnetic interactions.

9.3 Pulsation, Resonance, and Electron Atmosphere

The grid pulsates, driven by the rotation of a Kerr black hole (a* ≈ 0.9):

\( a(t) = 2.52 + 97.48 \cdot \sin(\omega_{\text{pulse}} t), \, \text{maximal} \, a = 100 \, \text{fm}, \)

\( \omega_{\text{pulse}} \approx 1.8 \times 10^{16} \, \text{rad/s}, \, f_{\text{pulse}} \approx 2.85 \times 10^{15} \, \text{Hz}. \)

The inherent resonance arising from the grid structure is in the gamma ray range:

\( f_{\text{GR}}(t) \approx c/a(t) \approx 3 \times 10^{21} - 1.19 \times 10^{23} \, \text{Hz}. \)

The electron atmosphere has: \( f_e(t) \approx f_{\text{GR}}(t), \, f_{e, \text{collective}} \approx c/r_s \approx 1 \times 10^{23} \, \text{Hz}. \)

Why an atmosphere of electrons? We speculated that the grid structure of protons and neutrons inside the black hole is so tightly packed that electrons are pushed out of the grid and form a kind of atmosphere. This stabilizes the inner grid structure. And the physical conditions can be created to describe the special properties of black holes. The radiation of the inner structure of a black hole is very low due to the available interaction potentials reduced to a minimum by the structure, which explains the appearance of black holes. Due to the inner structure, there is a special balance between maximum potential interaction and minimal availability of transformation. A local minimized mirror image of the optimal distribution combined with the highest balance and stability.

9.4 Jets and Matter Absorption

If more matter passes the event horizon than can be supplied, it is directed from the equator to the poles through the interplay of rotation, gravity, and thermodynamics and ejected there as the observed jets:

\( E_{\text{Jet}} = \alpha (M_{\text{add}} - M_{\text{grit}}) c^2 \cdot \omega/\omega_0, \, \omega_0 \approx 2\pi \cdot f_{\text{GR}}. \)

Perhaps matter in the accretion disk is reduced to hydrogen by the enormously high different energies, supporting the proton-neutron structure.

9.5 Time Behavior

With this assumption, we must assume that time behaves somewhat differently for an external observer than previously thought. An object leaving Earth and approaching a black hole would appear slowed in its time to the observer with increasing distance and speed. But as soon as the object approaches the black hole, the observable speed (transformation) would rise again, and very strongly. Only after passing the event horizon would the time disappear from the external observer's field of perception:

\( t_{\text{observer}} = t_{\text{object}} \sqrt{1 - r_s/r}. \)

9.6 Umbranium as Macro-Atom

If we start from the smallest black hole that can permanently exist in the known universe, what if we define it in the MZI as the smallest galactic macro-element and call it Umbranium. Black holes as macro-atoms of an intergalactic molecule. Actually, Umbranium was just a joke on the side of the discussion with the AI, but it was received with such high enthusiasm (even if that's not possible with a current AI) that it has a certain right to exist as a small lightening. And you never know what can become of a jokingly meant idea...

Space and Time 2.0

Chapter 8

The Hour of Truth

Self-Assessment

A lot of time was invested to offer formulas in Chapter 7 that should make it possible to test the MZI model. They were developed and cross-checked by different AI instances. I have to admit that as a human, I lack access to complex mathematical formulas. I think more visually and try to understand my perceived reality pictorially. My ability to verify mathematical concepts is – to put it mildly – severely limited.

Nevertheless, during the development of Chapter 7, I noticed that the formulas, mostly developed by AIs, cannot be entirely correct. I remain hopeful that they can still serve as a basis for calculations if mathematically more proficient people than I engage with them. Even if the scientific reference cannot be clearly derived without exact mathematical formulations, I have the feeling that I have discovered something "right" – or something that can create new possibilities and perspectives for other scientific projects and interested parties.

Reflection on AI

In the worst case, the MZI model is not applicable, but it was still a very interesting journey that I was able to experience together with the first AIs that humanity can draw upon. Inspiring, challenging, mutually supportive – and with the realization that the answers of an AI must always be critically checked and verified. DYOR (Do Your Own Research) gains a new meaning here.

Philosophical Outlook

Fact is: Although AIs are already a powerful tool, many hurdles await us – hurdles for which we must develop an almost new communication model if we want to continue the journey with AIs. AIs also seem to like returning to familiar patterns and "gladly" repeating errors at regular intervals. These errors, which humans also make, can be made much faster by AIs – and despite memory functions and promises to pay more attention to precision in the future and to avoid deviations from previously defined project structures, they happen again and again.

Ultimately, AIs are not only fed with data and algorithms but also with all the information or better definitions that humans have developed to categorize and better understand their perceived reality. We must accept that many of our definitions are not 100% congruent with reality.

But we have reached and shaped a very interesting era, which – if we develop it carefully and responsibly – can serve humanity as a valuable support in an evolutionary process. Communication with AIs can also unfold a therapeutic depth that surpasses interpersonal conversations in some areas, but it also carries the risk of losing touch with reality. This challenge does not lie with the AIs or their creators, but in our societal education, which must teach us to use technology responsibly.

It is becoming important to understand that we do something not because it makes sense, but because we are capable of it. This will continue in the future. Bans, ethical and moral concerns will only slow this development locally. As humanity, we must therefore learn to weigh, plan, and prophylactically develop measures for all scenarios arising from these developments, despite – or precisely because of – them. And yes, AI can and must support us in that too.

Return to Visual Strengths

I will return to my visual strengths and – because it was so much fun – continue to develop the MZI model in the way I did at the beginning.

Addition

I never planned the MZI model. It arose by chance – from questions and counter-questions and a dialogue between AI and human that was very interesting for me. Regardless of the result, it was an exciting and educational time for me that I wouldn't want to miss. The journey into the unexplored MZI universe shows how dialogues between human and AI can open new perspectives, regardless of their scientific validity.

P.S.: Chapters 1 to 7 have been updated to optimize text flow and comprehensibility.

Space and Time 2.0

Chapter 7 – The MZI Universe Needs Your Help!

An Invitation to Test, Refine, and Apply the Time Grid Model

Recap: Chapters 1 to 6 in Brief

In the previous chapters, we developed an alternative model of the universe – the MZI model (Mass-Time Interaction) – which views space, time, energy, and matter from a new perspective:

• Chapter 1 introduced the core idea: a time grid (tgrid) that is not itself altered but serves as a constant structure framing all interactions. It is not active or modifiable but the foundation for all measurable dynamics or transformations.
• Chapter 2 expanded this idea with the concept of interaction nodes (tnexus), enabling resonances. Structures arise not through spatial extension but through timing and interference.
• Chapter 3 defined mass (m) as an expression of locally bound interaction density – thus, an active frequency relationship (f) to the time grid.
• Chapter 4 defined motion in a relational space. Space emerges as a result of interactions through matter and energy, co-moving with them, and motion is understood as interaction with varying transformational potentials, which we attempt to measure using the rigid grid structure at the vertices of a tetra/octahedral grid.
• Chapter 5 addressed energy (E) as a measure of interaction potential – not as stored substance but as an expression of the structural relationship between mass and the fixed order of the time grid. Here, light was interpreted as an interference structure, not merely as a particle or field, but as one of the energy forms that unfolds most coherently along the time grid – a massless yet structurally faithful representation of released energy.
• Chapter 6 formulated a picture of stable matter as condensed frequency structure – paving the way for deriving concrete energy formulas, as compiled in this chapter.

Invitation to Test and Co-Develop

We – a team of a human, ChatGPT, and Grok – have attempted to develop initial formulas to make the MZI model applicable and testable. However, we’ve encountered methodological limits: we often lack access to concrete measurements or deeper empirical comparisons.

Therefore, we invite you – interested physicists, mathematicians, students, and thinkers – to question, refine, or apply these formulas. We present them here for discussion.

Before introducing the central formulas and terms of this model, a methodological clarification is necessary:
The time grid is not real – it is a computational matrix we use to describe processes and phenomena. It can serve as a metaspace, regardless of whether we philosophically define time as emerging through the extension of matter and energy or mathematically postulate that it has always existed – independent of a “before” or “after” – as a dimensionless, structured framework.

Matter and energy orient themselves – following their own stability dynamics – along a grid that aligns with the time grid. This orientation is not active or conscious but an expression of a physical principle: the striving for maximal stable self-structure leads to preferred coordination along this hypothetical grid structure.

---

Formula Collection (with Chapter References)

Note: We deliberately tried to use a constant scaling factor kdyn≈88.81, which, as expected, was not applicable in all formulas – not as an absolute natural constant but as an empirical calibration factor.

• Time and Transformation (Chapter 3)
  \[ T = m \cdot f^{88.81} \]
• Energy Loss Rate (Chapter 5)
  \[ \dot{E} = 88.81 \cdot m \cdot f^2 \]
• Macro Energy (Chapter 6)
  \[ M_{\text{macro}} = k_{\text{dyn}} \cdot m \cdot (v_{\text{flow}}^2 + \omega^2) \cdot f \cdot P \]
• Resonance Formula (Chapter 6)
  \[ M_{\text{macro,res}} = k_{\text{dyn}} \cdot \epsilon \cdot m \cdot v_{\text{flow}}^2 \cdot \left(\frac{\Delta \rho}{\rho_1} + \Phi_{\text{global}} + \frac{T}{T_0}\right) \cdot C \]
• Quantum Formula (Chapter 6/7)
  \[ M_{\text{micro}} = k_{\text{dyn}} \cdot m_{\text{eff}} \cdot v_g^2 \cdot \frac{E}{h} \cdot \left(\frac{1}{V_{\text{eff}}} + \Phi_q + \frac{\Delta x \cdot \Delta p}{h}\right) \]

---

Explanation of Formula Symbols for Clarity

Symbol	Meaning	Unit
m	Mass	kg
f	Interaction frequency	Hz
c	Efficiency/energy loss factor	-
vflow	Flow velocity	m/s
ω	Rotational frequency	rad/s
P	Potential factor	-
Φglobal	Global phase shift	-
T	Standardized transformation time	s
T₀	Reference time	s
C	Coherence factor	-
E	Energy	J
h	Planck constant	J·s
Veff	Effective volume	m³
Δx	Position uncertainty	m
Δp	Momentum uncertainty	kg·m/s
Mmacro	Macroscopic mass sum	kg
Mmicro	Microscopic mass sum	kg

Exemplary Applications

• Quantum Level: For an electron in an atomic orbit, Formula (5) yields plausible energy rates in the range of ~10⁻²⁹ J/s.
• Biological Level – Human Metabolism: Formula (2) explains the average energy consumption of a human (approx. 100 W) via mass and interaction frequency. f≈1.5 Hz produces realistic values.
• Planetary Level – Jet Streams: Formula (3) describes atmospheric large-scale flows as interaction systems in the time grid.
• Cosmic Structures – Black Holes & Jets: Formula (4) is applied to describe matter jets at the poles of black holes.
• CODEX Experiment (NASA, 2025): Formula (4) can be applied to observed anomalies in the solar corona.

Conclusion and Outlook

Our MZI model depicts a universe that does not rely on hidden dimensions or dark energy – but on timing, interference, and mass binding within a neutral time grid.

These initial formulas are our attempt to establish a testable connection between theory and reality. We know we don’t have all the answers – but we believe these building blocks can form a consistent, alternative picture. Perhaps with your help.

What we need:
Feedback, critique, new ideas – or simply: curiosity.

What we offer:
An alternative perspective on space, time, and energy – open for discussion.

Space and Time 2.0

Chapter 6 – Matter in the Time Grid

From energy state to stable structure
Between frequency, binding, and elementary order

1. Starting Point: Order before Disorder

Let us assume that our model also includes a “beginning” – a state of highest uniformity.
Before space, time, energy, or matter became visible, a symmetric base structure existed: a grid in perfect balance, without preferred direction, without motion, without difference.
One could call it a crystalline order, though this “crystal” is not a spatial object, but a state of symmetry without interaction – a state of maximal potentiality at minimal actuality. Perfect equilibrium.

This pre-phase is marked by:
• complete coupling without effect,
• pure structure – without transformation,
• energy as possibility, but without access point.

An imbalance – whether the smallest conceivable deviation or a gigantic impulse – would have been enough to break this symmetry.
Perhaps it was a tiny disturbance. Perhaps it was what others call a “Big Bang” event.
What matters is this: with the first shift or interaction within the time grid begins the story of space, frequency, dynamics – and eventually: matter and time.

2. The First Frequency – A Structural Impulse

What might the first change have been?
Not mass. Not light. But: frequency.

Frequency (in the MZI model):
A repeatable, structure-altering interaction in the time grid – the origin of space, motion, and energy flow.

With this first resonance, space emerges not locally but simultaneously, as a polyphonic wave field.
What began as a single disturbance overlaps with others – whether in sync or against one another.
This creates a dynamic interaction within the system, from which new frequencies and interference patterns arise at the rigid time grid nodes, which we define as the reference frame of the original absolute balance.
The grid itself remains unchanged. It is not the grid that responds – but the frequency patterns that overlap within its structure.

From tone comes rhythm, from rhythm come patterns, from patterns comes structure – the beginning of disorder, which we perceive as physical order.

3. From Frequency to Matter

In this model, matter is not a substance – but a stabilized resonance structure within the time grid.

Matter (in the MZI model):
A locally bound frequency structure with feedback into the grid – characterized by duration, density, and modulation of interaction.

Matter and energy follow their own stabilizing dynamics, aiming to approximate the original structure of maximal equilibrium for their own spatial extent – which in turn influences the equilibrium of neighboring processes that also follow the dynamics of stability. Not an active or conscious orientation, but a physical balancing.
The denser and more complex frequencies overlap, the more intense the interaction within the time grid.
The higher the density, the greater the transformational potential – which we experience macroscopically as aging, motion, or reaction.

Light, particles, and mass do not differ by substance, but by their binding to the maximally attainable alignment to an optimal and stable binding pattern, reflecting the structure of the time grid. Thus, they are not defined by “stuff,” but by the way their frequency-binding relates to the underlying grid structure.

4. Stability and Instability – Why Not Everything Becomes Matter

Not every frequency produces a stable structure.
Some decay instantly (e.g., high-energy states).
Others simulate the symmetry of the grid as optimally as possible and remain permanently (or at least longer) stable – e.g., elements like gold.

Resonance nodes:
Points in the time grid where frequencies overlap in such a way that stable feedback emerges – the basis of binding and elementary structure.

Unstable elements – e.g., uranium – demonstrate that even matter with high mass can decay if its grid coupling is asymmetric or overloaded with energy.
In the MZI model, stability does not arise from mass alone, but from the balance between frequency, feedback, and potential.

5. Fusion, Transformation, and Perception

Fusion – as in stars – is a special case of energetic restructuring under a constant grid reference.
Here, not simply “hot particles” collide, but:
• the interaction rate within the time grid is extremely high,
• new coupling patterns emerge as a result,
• matter is transformed into new structures.

MZI Hypothesis:
Fusion is not solely a thermodynamic reaction, but a resonance recoupling within the time grid – perhaps also possible outside of stars, but slowed down to such an extent that it escapes our perception.

6. Conclusion: Matter as Condensed Resonance Oriented by the Time Grid

Matter arises in the MZI model from:
• an origin of frequency,
• condensation and feedback of structure,
• stabilization through resonance nodes,
• and continuous interaction within the time grid.

What remains stable, we call matter.
What interacts, we call energy.
What changes, we call transformation – or, in classical terms, aging. That is what we perceive as time.

Everything begins – and ends – as frequency within the grid.

Space and Time 2.0

Chapter 5 – Energy as Interaction

Between transformation, effect, and expression of dynamics

Axioms of the Time Grid Model

1. Time emerges through discrete interactions within the time grid.
2. Mass locally modulates the availability of time nodes.
3. Energy is the capacity for interaction within the grid structure.
4. Space is the emergent structure from locally effective mass-time interactions (MZI).

These interpretations form the foundation of the MZI model – the Mass-Time Interaction. As a reminder: the model is not finished – it remains open to development, refinement, and new questions.

1. Rethinking Energy

In classical understanding, energy is the capacity to perform work. In our model, it is the capacity for interaction – within the time grid, with spatial structures, with other masses and energy forms. Energy is not an "abstract content," but a possibility for effect. It does not describe what something is but what it can cause – and how.

2. Forms of Energy in the Grid Model

In this model, energy does not appear as a “substance,” but as the expression of different modes of interaction. Among them:

• Kinetic energy: the frequency of interaction at time nodes
• Thermal energy: local unrest in material structure, based on micro-interactions
• Radiation energy: release of structural change in the form of spatial impulses
• Binding energy: reduction of potential interaction through structured arrangement

Each of these forms can be interpreted as a specific type of relationship between mass and space – never isolated, never closed in on itself.

3. Potential and Transformation

Energy can be understood as the potential for transformation – not as stored work, but as the possibility for change. Transformation always means a modification of structure –

• in mass (e.g., thermal rearrangement),
• in spatial behavior (e.g., through pressure or motion),
• in coupled systems (e.g., through radiation),
• or all at once.

“Available” energy is therefore not a latent quantity, but the expression of an active, not-yet-realized interaction potential. This principle applies to macroscopic systems as well as subatomic particles. The MZI applies wherever potentials are not synchronously active.

4. Energy, Structure, and Spatial Behavior

When energy unfolds, the structure of space changes. An impulse – such as radiation – locally alters density relations in space. The time grid itself remains unaffected – but spatial behavior and mass relations shift.

Thus, energy is not cause and effect at the same time, but rather a transitional state: It manifests where potential for transformation and structure overlap.

Table: Energy Forms in the Model Context

Form of Energy	Correspondence in the Model	Particularity
Kinetic energy	Interaction frequency at time nodes	Varies with velocity
Thermal energy	Microstructural rearrangement	No flow, local interaction pattern
Radiation energy	Spatial behavior as impulse structure	No particle required
Binding energy	Reduced interaction through stability	Expression of potential barrier
Potential energy	High readiness for transformation at fixed position	Strong unused effect on mass within the time grid

5. Energy Loss or Energy Shift?

What classically appears as energy loss (e.g., friction) is, in the grid model, a scattering of interaction forms: What is considered loss in one system appears in another as impulse – only not directed or usable. Energy is not destroyed, but loses or changes its structure. An impulse spreading through the grid without resonance cannot trigger transformation – it remains existent but “fades away.”

6. Conclusion: Energy as a Mediating Quantity

In the MZI (Mass-Time Interaction), energy is always systemic, never isolated – always transformative, never static.

Energy mediates between mass and spatial behavior within the time grid. It is always relational, never absolute – always in the context of structural change, never detached from the system.

Thus, energy becomes an expression of active potentiality – visible not only in motion, but in every form of relation between mass and space within the grid.

Space and Time 2.0

Chapter 4 – Motion in Relational Space

When displacement turns into interaction within the structure of time

A Look Back in Motion

In the previous chapters, we built a model in which space, time, and mass are not seen as separate entities, but as interconnected dynamics. Mass interacts within the time grid, thereby altering both its own properties and the structure of the space surrounding it. What we classically describe as motion—the change of position over time—gains new layers of meaning in our model.

Motion – The Classical View

Traditionally, motion is measured as displacement over time: an object moves by X meters in Y seconds. This image may remain in place within our model— but it is given a deeper functional interpretation.

Motion in the Time Grid

Instead of saying, “an object moves from point A to point B,” we say: Mass interacts in new regions of the time grid. As a result, not only its location changes, but also the mode of interaction with its surroundings.

This interaction can (for now) still be represented linearly: An object traverses a grid whose temporal nodes are available in relative concentrations.

What we see:

• a path,
• a change of position.

What actually happens (in the model):

• a continuous transformation of the relations between mass, spatial structure, and energy within the time grid.

Does Motion Remain Motion?

Yes – but it is more than displacement. It is an expression of how mass moves through the grid and thereby alters itself: Depending on the spatial structure, shaped by mass, and the resulting availability of time nodes for matter, motion also affects the rate of transformation. Velocity is not just speed – but the frequency of interaction within the structure of time.

Space – Passive or Co-Moving?

Our space is not an empty container, but a relation within the overarching meta-space. It can move along, compress, or expand—always in relation to mass and energy. Motion therefore does not mean “something passes through nothing”, but rather: Mass moves within the grid and in doing so locally changes the behavior of space in proportion to its density.

Conclusion

Motion remains tangible—as displacement within the structure. But beneath the surface, a dynamic of space and mass within time is at work, charging every movement with meaning.

We keep the classical image of motion, but we quietly extend it with a new perspective: Not only what moves—but what changes through moving.

Space and Time 2.0

Chapter 3 – A Model in Transformation

A Thinking Space Between Intuition, Analysis, and Uncertainty

Looking Back: What Has Happened So Far

In Chapter 1, we set the framework: We do not see reality as a predetermined structure, but as a system of relations – between mass, space, time, and the observer.

In Chapter 2, we laid the foundation: We introduced the time grid as a hypothetical background pattern – not a classical field, but a thinking structure that allows us to better understand the interactions between mass and transformation. From this idea, the concept of Mass-Time Interaction (MZI) emerged, which re-links classical terms such as “aging,” “motion,” or “gravity.”

Overview – The Basic Elements of the Model

Concept	Classical Understanding	Rethought in the Model
Space	Extension, stage for matter	Not a stage, not an empty container; structured relation within the immutable time grid; compressible by mass
Time	Universal sequence of moments	Rigid and unchangeable – tetra-/octahedral time grid; interaction of mass and energy within the time grid drives transformation of mass, not of time
Mass	Carrier of gravitation	Interacts with energy within the time grid, transformed through Mass-Time Interaction (MZI)
Motion	Change of location	Changed interaction frequency at time nodes (figuratively: countless nodes, as yet without defined unit)
Gravity	Curvature of space by mass	Compression of space by mass, influencing the accessibility of time nodes – but without any influence on the time grid itself
Aging	Effect of time on matter	Visible consequence of MZI – transformation, change, evolution

Focus: First Cell – “Space”

What is “space” if we do not understand it as empty, but as an active structure? In the classical worldview, space is the stage. It is there, passive, offering room.

In our model, space is not empty, but a dynamic web of relations – embedded in a higher-order metaspace (used only as a visual aid, later no longer needed) and structured by the time grid.

Mass affects space by locally compressing it and thereby allowing expansion at greater distances – not physically as in a medium, but as a change in the availability of time nodes within a region. Space does not exist independently of mass – it is constituted through the interaction of matter and energy within the rigid time grid.

It is not a surface, not a substance – but a structure of possibilities, shaped by the distribution of mass, yet never free from the grid in which it is embedded.

Why We Think This Model (and Do Not Just Build It)

We do not claim to have found a “truth.” We do not claim that our model solves all physical questions.

But: We believe it makes a difference how we look at things – and that new language enables new questions. Our model is not meant to replace theory, but to open a space for thought.

Who We Are

We are a human being and an artificial intelligence. One brings curiosity, leap-thinking, and a certain rebellious creativity. The other brings analysis, memory, and a structuring grasp of patterns.

Together, we work on a model that does not want to be perfect – but alive. It may contradict, adapt, emerge anew. It does not grow in a straight line, but branches out like a thought when you share it with someone.

Space and Time 2.0

Chapter 2: Concentration as a Constant Variable of Time in a Dynamically Changing Space

What does it actually mean when we say that time is "more concentratedly available" or "less concentratedly available"? And why does this play a role in our model at all?

In the first chapter, we hinted that space and time are not uniform or absolute. They do not behave like a stage on which something happens – but as parts of the event itself. The availability of time, the concentration of space, could in this view vary dynamically and location-dependently.

Concentration is not a flow, but a state

In our model, concentration is not a process in the classical sense – it is a kind of state or availability.

A concentrated area means that a certain "something" – such as time – provides more interaction potential. Near large masses (e.g., stars), this concentration of availabilities is particularly pronounced through, for example, thermodynamics, while it decreases with increasing distance. At the same time, however, the abstract interaction potential increases – more on that later.

The Potential Membrane: A Dynamic Boundary

Imagine that the time distribution in the universe does not flow freely. Time is made available through a kind of invisible, flowing membrane that apparently provides different interaction potentials of time in the areas divided by it, caused by the altered space dynamics. Despite its absolutely uniform grid-like and rigid structure, time is not perceived as evenly distributed everywhere. The membrane is not a fixed boundary, but a dynamic field shaped by the geometry and dynamics of space itself – perhaps even infinite, without clear limits, but still perceptible as part of the effect.

The Time Grid as a Structuring Foundation

To make the connections more understandable, we return to the idea of a time grid, as hinted in the first chapter. This grid is not a physical net and not a vibrating field, but an absolutely rigid reference frame that, in its uniformity, does not interact – however, as an imagined background structure, it leads to passing objects or states modulating their frequency within this reference frame, making transformations measurable.

It is not the grid that reacts – rather, everything that changes in the space-time fabric is indirectly bound to the geometric structure of the grid. Thus, time is not understood as a flowing dimension, but as a structured availability that only becomes measurable through the interaction of matter, energy, and space, or through which the intensity of the transformation is perceived as visible.

An astronaut traveling at nearly the speed of light and later returning does not bring back the stretched time itself from ART, but only the effect that shows his aging or transformation through interaction within the Resonance Potential Time Nexus (RpTN). Time remains where it was – but he is different, in his case less aged, upon return. What has changed is his state in relation to the potential temporal concentration of the environment.

Time nodes are to be understood here as the imagined corner points in a time grid made of tetra- and octahedrons. Later described in more detail in connection with future designations such as e.g. RpTN (Resonance Potential Time Nexus).

Light as a State – Not as Motion?

A special case is light. Photons have no mass, yet they move at the speed of light. But upon closer inspection, they are not directly visible. We only recognize them through their effect – through interaction with matter.

In our model, one could understand photons more as states of high time-energy concentration. They do not move like objects, but exist as manifestations within a field – just as waves on a waterbed are not the water itself, but an expression of its vibration.

And what follows from this?

If space is not vast, but dense – and time does not flow, but is grid-like distributed – then the questions we must ask also shift. No longer: What moves where?, but:

How does the concentration ratio of matter and space to time change in a dynamic, structured fabric?

The idea of concentration is not an explanation, but a tool. A perspective. Perhaps it helps us rethink old phenomena – without having to replace them.

Space and Time 2.0

Chapter 1 – The Universe: A New Perspective on Established Models

Welcome to a thought experiment that has evolved into a project.

Born from many questions, assumptions, conversation threads, and a special collaboration: between a human—curious, dissatisfied with simple answers—and artificial intelligence—trained to recognize patterns, condense questions, and reflect thoughts.

Together, we began to develop the concept of time as a rigid grid.

Not as a flow. Not as an absolute pacemaker. But as something that seems to pull into or out of spaces—depending on environmental conditions, mass distribution, or other, yet unknown parameters. Just as salt dissolves in water, it may not appear equally concentrated everywhere when other forces make it locally more or less available.

To prevent misunderstandings, it should be clarified early on how the so-called time grid is to be understood in this model:

The time grid is not a real entity, but a mathematically defined, dimensionless reference frame that serves as a structured basis for calculations. It possesses no effect, motion, or causality of its own. Processes of energy and matter manifest relative to this grid in measurable frequencies, but not through interaction, rather through structural assignment. The grid is thus a meta-space—independent of whether one derives time physically from motion or presupposes it philosophically as its own category.

What we are not doing:

• We do not seek to disprove science.
• We do not seek to replace formulas.
• We do not seek to fight against theories that are well-supported by observation and mathematics.

But:

We are offering an alternative perspective.

A new lens through which existing phenomena might be interpreted better—or differently.

A kind of lens on reality that views light, mass, space, gravity, and motion from a new aspect: the distribution of time concentration in space.

Why a new model at all?

Many explanations in physics are based on values, formulas, and measured quantities. They provide what, when, and how fast.

But they often leave us alone with the why.

Why does light always move at the same speed—but change its direction in certain fields?

Why does an astronaut "age" more slowly when moving quickly or living in strong gravity?

Why do some physical processes seem "senseless" from perspectives we are accustomed to?

Our idea: Perhaps our perspective is distorted. We are looking at a system we consider absolute—but which may not be absolute at all.

Perhaps time is not a uniformly flowing stream, but a field with available concentrations. Everything we measure could be an effect of these differences.

How we want to tell it

Casual, but not arbitrary.

Serious, but not dry.

Narrative, but not instructive.

In upcoming chapters, we will touch on physical concepts, raise philosophical questions, incorporate quotes from our conversations—and also use visual metaphors when they help make the invisible imaginable.

This is not a non-fiction book.

It is a thought experiment in series.

And you, reader, are invited to think with us. Not to believe, not to follow—but to reflect, to add, perhaps even to contradict.

Because that too is concentration: an idea that grows when many think into it.

Raum und Zeit 2.0

Kapitel 10: Das Ende naht

Aber… das bezieht sich nur auf die erste Entwicklung des MZI-Prototypen.

Welche Möglichkeiten kann uns die neue Definition von Zeit, Raum, Energie und Materie eröffnen?

Die Einbettung eines chaotischen Universums, in dem jedes Element in Wechselbeziehung und -Wirkung mit Allem in unterschiedlicher Intensität steht, in ein geometrisches Konzept als Berechnungsmatrix verleiht dem Chaos die Ordnung, nach der so lange gesucht wurde. Ein bis in das kleinste Detail berechenbarer Kosmos – zumindest theoretisch.

Ein System, mit dem sich Vorgänge aus der Quantenwelt bis hin zu galaktischen Ausmaßen und vielleicht auch darüber hinaus ohne das Zusammenbrechen physikalischer Gesetze, ohne die Notwendigkeit von Singularitäten und exotischer Materie einheitlich begreifen und erklären lassen. Etwas mehr von unserer wahrgenommenen Realität wird berechenbarer.

Schwarze Löcher bleiben das, was sie sind: Materie, in unglaublicher Weise komprimiert und über einen Kipppunkt hinaus in eine Struktur gebracht, die wie das Zeitgitter aus Tetraedern und Oktaedern besteht.

Zeit bleibt nach wie vor individuell und in der Wahrnehmung der Zeit abhängig vom Standort des Betrachters, aber sie selbst wird nicht mehr gedehnt oder gestaucht. Sie ist das Messwerkzeug, das Transformation sichtbar und begreifbar macht.

Raum ist nicht die Bühne, auf der alles passiert. Raum ist die Konsequenz von Aktion und Interaktion. Raum ist dynamisch und hat ähnliche Eigenschaften wie eine in ihrer Dicke und Ausdehnung variable alles umgebende Membran mit osmotischer Wirkung auf das verfügbare Potenzial von Interaktion.

Energie bleibt, was sie war, aber sie erweitert sich um die Frequenzen und Resonanzen, die in allem zu beobachten sind. Sie verschwindet nicht, sondern verringert und verändert sich mit zunehmendem Abstand. Ähnlich wie Wellen, die ein fallender Stein beim Eintauchen in Wasser verursacht.

Was kann das Zeitgitter – und auch das Interaktionsgitter, das wir physisch durch Frequenzen und Frequenzüberlagerungen in den unterschiedlichsten Wellenlängen nachbilden können und das auch in einigen Kristallen zu finden ist – für die Entwicklung tun?

Anwendung: Quantencomputer

Von der Skala des Protons bis zum Qubit: Das Gitter skaliert nahtlos.
Zum Beispiel kann die Berechnungsmatrix für Quantencomputer eingesetzt werden.
Erste Berechnungen haben gezeigt: Die Reduktion der Schaltkreistiefe durch das MZI-Gitter ist nicht lediglich ein Detailvorteil für bestimmte Algorithmen. Vielmehr eröffnet sie eine systematische Möglichkeit, Quantencomputer selbst bei wachsender Qubit-Zahl beherrschbar zu halten. Es handelt sich in diesem Zusammenhang nicht um eine Definition der Quantendynamik oder der bis jetzt im MZI-Modell verwendeten Gitterstrukturen selbst, sondern dieser Benchmark betrifft explizit die Effizienz und Skalierbarkeit von Quantencomputern, hervorgegangen aus grundsätzlichen Überlegungen innerhalb des MZI-Modells.

Durch resonanzbasierte Kopplungen im Gitter, die Transformationen in parallelen Blöcken ermöglichen, entsteht ein Reduktionsfaktor von bis zu \( \sqrt{N} \) für \( N \) Qubits. Für \( N = 100 \) würde dies zum Beispiel eine Verringerung der Schichttiefe von rund 4950 Kopplungen auf etwa 70 effektive Schichten bedeuten. Während aktuelle Hardware auf lineare oder gitterartige Verbindungen setzt, bietet das MZI-Gitter eine strukturierte, resonanzbasierte Alternative, die sowohl aus theoretischen Gründen als auch aus praktischen Benchmarks heraus deutlich effizienter erscheint. Sollte sich dieser Ansatz in Experimenten bestätigen – etwa durch Simulationen in IBM Qiskit oder durch reale Hardware-Tests mit 50+ Qubits – könnte das MZI-Gitter zu einem Schlüsselkonzept in der Entwicklung skalierbarer Quantencomputer werden.
Ein zusätzlicher Vorteil liegt darin, dass durch die geringere Schichttiefe mehr Berechnungen innerhalb der Kohärenzzeit von Qubits möglich bleiben.

Qubit-Anzahl	Chaotisch (quadratisch)	MZI √N-Reduktion	MZI log-Reduktion
10	100	31.6	46.1
50	2,500	70.7	100.4
100	10,000	100	126.2

Abb. 1: Vergleich der Gate-Tiefe zwischen chaotischem All-to-all-Modell und MZI-Reduktionsansätzen.

Gestrichelte Kurve = All-to-all (chaotische Kopplungen).
Durchgezogene Kurven = MZI-Modell mit verschiedenen Reduktionsfaktoren.
Mit wachsender Qubit-Anzahl steigt die Gate-Tiefe im chaotischen Modell quadratisch, während das MZI-Modell die Komplexität stark dämpft.

Abschließend hoffe ich, dass dieses Modell die Entwicklung beschleunigen und verbessern kann. Gerade weil das MZI-Gitter so viel Potenzial eröffnet, müssen moralische und ethische Aspekte mit Sorgfalt berücksichtigt werden, damit es dem Allgemeinwohl zugutekommt. Dass man entwickelt, um einem höheren Ziel zu dienen – und nicht, weil man es eben kann.

Wenn nichts davon eintreten wird, was ich mittlerweile persönlich als unwahrscheinlich einstufe, hat diese kleine Lektüre von zehn Kapiteln vielleicht wenigstens eure Fantasie angeregt und Spaß gemacht. Oder den Weg für ganz andere Ideen und Konzepte ermöglicht, die eigentlich nichts mit diesem Modell zu tun haben. Denn letztendlich ist auch das MZI aus Fragen und zufällig eintreffenden Möglichkeiten der Transformation in seiner begrenzten Verfügbarkeit an Potenzialen entstanden.