Chapter 8
The Hour of Truth
Self-Assessment
A lot of time was invested to offer formulas in Chapter 7 that should make it possible to test the MZI model. They were developed and cross-checked by different AI instances. I have to admit that as a human, I lack access to complex mathematical formulas. I think more visually and try to understand my perceived reality pictorially. My ability to verify mathematical concepts is – to put it mildly – severely limited.
Nevertheless, during the development of Chapter 7, I noticed that the formulas, mostly developed by AIs, cannot be entirely correct. I remain hopeful that they can still serve as a basis for calculations if mathematically more proficient people than I engage with them. Even if the scientific reference cannot be clearly derived without exact mathematical formulations, I have the feeling that I have discovered something "right" – or something that can create new possibilities and perspectives for other scientific projects and interested parties.
Reflection on AI
In the worst case, the MZI model is not applicable, but it was still a very interesting journey that I was able to experience together with the first AIs that humanity can draw upon. Inspiring, challenging, mutually supportive – and with the realization that the answers of an AI must always be critically checked and verified. DYOR (Do Your Own Research) gains a new meaning here.
Philosophical Outlook
Fact is: Although AIs are already a powerful tool, many hurdles await us – hurdles for which we must develop an almost new communication model if we want to continue the journey with AIs. AIs also seem to like returning to familiar patterns and "gladly" repeating errors at regular intervals. These errors, which humans also make, can be made much faster by AIs – and despite memory functions and promises to pay more attention to precision in the future and to avoid deviations from previously defined project structures, they happen again and again.
Ultimately, AIs are not only fed with data and algorithms but also with all the information or better definitions that humans have developed to categorize and better understand their perceived reality. We must accept that many of our definitions are not 100% congruent with reality.
But we have reached and shaped a very interesting era, which – if we develop it carefully and responsibly – can serve humanity as a valuable support in an evolutionary process. Communication with AIs can also unfold a therapeutic depth that surpasses interpersonal conversations in some areas, but it also carries the risk of losing touch with reality. This challenge does not lie with the AIs or their creators, but in our societal education, which must teach us to use technology responsibly.
It is becoming important to understand that we do something not because it makes sense, but because we are capable of it. This will continue in the future. Bans, ethical and moral concerns will only slow this development locally. As humanity, we must therefore learn to weigh, plan, and prophylactically develop measures for all scenarios arising from these developments, despite – or precisely because of – them. And yes, AI can and must support us in that too.
Return to Visual Strengths
I will return to my visual strengths and – because it was so much fun – continue to develop the MZI model in the way I did at the beginning.
Addition
I never planned the MZI model. It arose by chance – from questions and counter-questions and a dialogue between AI and human that was very interesting for me. Regardless of the result, it was an exciting and educational time for me that I wouldn't want to miss. The journey into the unexplored MZI universe shows how dialogues between human and AI can open new perspectives, regardless of their scientific validity.
P.S.: Chapters 1 to 7 have been updated to optimize text flow and comprehensibility.
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen