Chapter 1 – The Universe: A New Perspective on Established Models
Welcome to a thought experiment that has evolved into a project.
Born from many questions, assumptions, conversation threads, and a special collaboration: between a human—curious, dissatisfied with simple answers—and artificial intelligence—trained to recognize patterns, condense questions, and reflect thoughts.
Together, we began to develop the concept of time as a rigid grid.
Not as a flow. Not as an absolute pacemaker. But as something that seems to pull into or out of spaces—depending on environmental conditions, mass distribution, or other, yet unknown parameters. Just as salt dissolves in water, it may not appear equally concentrated everywhere when other forces make it locally more or less available.
To prevent misunderstandings, it should be clarified early on how the so-called time grid is to be understood in this model:
The time grid is not a real entity, but a mathematically defined, dimensionless reference frame that serves as a structured basis for calculations. It possesses no effect, motion, or causality of its own. Processes of energy and matter manifest relative to this grid in measurable frequencies, but not through interaction, rather through structural assignment. The grid is thus a meta-space—independent of whether one derives time physically from motion or presupposes it philosophically as its own category.
What we are not doing:
- We do not seek to disprove science.
- We do not seek to replace formulas.
- We do not seek to fight against theories that are well-supported by observation and mathematics.
But:
We are offering an alternative perspective.
A new lens through which existing phenomena might be interpreted better—or differently.
A kind of lens on reality that views light, mass, space, gravity, and motion from a new aspect: the distribution of time concentration in space.
Why a new model at all?
Many explanations in physics are based on values, formulas, and measured quantities. They provide what, when, and how fast.
But they often leave us alone with the why.
Why does light always move at the same speed—but change its direction in certain fields?
Why does an astronaut "age" more slowly when moving quickly or living in strong gravity?
Why do some physical processes seem "senseless" from perspectives we are accustomed to?
Our idea: Perhaps our perspective is distorted. We are looking at a system we consider absolute—but which may not be absolute at all.
Perhaps time is not a uniformly flowing stream, but a field with available concentrations. Everything we measure could be an effect of these differences.
How we want to tell it
Casual, but not arbitrary.
Serious, but not dry.
Narrative, but not instructive.
In upcoming chapters, we will touch on physical concepts, raise philosophical questions, incorporate quotes from our conversations—and also use visual metaphors when they help make the invisible imaginable.
This is not a non-fiction book.
It is a thought experiment in series.
And you, reader, are invited to think with us. Not to believe, not to follow—but to reflect, to add, perhaps even to contradict.
Because that too is concentration: an idea that grows when many think into it.
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen