Space and Time 2.0

Chapter 2: Concentration as a Constant Variable of Time in a Dynamically Changing Space

What does it actually mean when we say that time is "more concentratedly available" or "less concentratedly available"? And why does this play a role in our model at all?

In the first chapter, we hinted that space and time are not uniform or absolute. They do not behave like a stage on which something happens – but as parts of the event itself. The availability of time, the concentration of space, could in this view vary dynamically and location-dependently.

Concentration is not a flow, but a state

In our model, concentration is not a process in the classical sense – it is a kind of state or availability.

A concentrated area means that a certain "something" – such as time – provides more interaction potential. Near large masses (e.g., stars), this concentration of availabilities is particularly pronounced through, for example, thermodynamics, while it decreases with increasing distance. At the same time, however, the abstract interaction potential increases – more on that later.

The Potential Membrane: A Dynamic Boundary

Imagine that the time distribution in the universe does not flow freely. Time is made available through a kind of invisible, flowing membrane that apparently provides different interaction potentials of time in the areas divided by it, caused by the altered space dynamics. Despite its absolutely uniform grid-like and rigid structure, time is not perceived as evenly distributed everywhere. The membrane is not a fixed boundary, but a dynamic field shaped by the geometry and dynamics of space itself – perhaps even infinite, without clear limits, but still perceptible as part of the effect.

The Time Grid as a Structuring Foundation

To make the connections more understandable, we return to the idea of a time grid, as hinted in the first chapter. This grid is not a physical net and not a vibrating field, but an absolutely rigid reference frame that, in its uniformity, does not interact – however, as an imagined background structure, it leads to passing objects or states modulating their frequency within this reference frame, making transformations measurable.

It is not the grid that reacts – rather, everything that changes in the space-time fabric is indirectly bound to the geometric structure of the grid. Thus, time is not understood as a flowing dimension, but as a structured availability that only becomes measurable through the interaction of matter, energy, and space, or through which the intensity of the transformation is perceived as visible.

An astronaut traveling at nearly the speed of light and later returning does not bring back the stretched time itself from ART, but only the effect that shows his aging or transformation through interaction within the Resonance Potential Time Nexus (RpTN). Time remains where it was – but he is different, in his case less aged, upon return. What has changed is his state in relation to the potential temporal concentration of the environment.

Time nodes are to be understood here as the imagined corner points in a time grid made of tetra- and octahedrons. Later described in more detail in connection with future designations such as e.g. RpTN (Resonance Potential Time Nexus).

Light as a State – Not as Motion?

A special case is light. Photons have no mass, yet they move at the speed of light. But upon closer inspection, they are not directly visible. We only recognize them through their effect – through interaction with matter.

In our model, one could understand photons more as states of high time-energy concentration. They do not move like objects, but exist as manifestations within a field – just as waves on a waterbed are not the water itself, but an expression of its vibration.

And what follows from this?

If space is not vast, but dense – and time does not flow, but is grid-like distributed – then the questions we must ask also shift. No longer: What moves where?, but:

How does the concentration ratio of matter and space to time change in a dynamic, structured fabric?

The idea of concentration is not an explanation, but a tool. A perspective. Perhaps it helps us rethink old phenomena – without having to replace them.